Pennsylvania DUI Checkpoints: A Model of Inefficiency

One of the main arguments in favor of DUI checkpoints is that are an effective measure to catch DUI.  However, when you look at the data, this is not the case. Far from it.

Pennsylvania DUI Checkpoints: Model of Inefficiency

Pennsylvania DUI Checkpoints: Model of Inefficiency

Take for example the statistics from an expensive DUI checkpoint held in in Lebanon County, PA  recently:

478 stops yield 1 DUI arrest in Annville

One person was arrested for driving under the influence of synthetic drugs when a sobriety checkpoint was conducted Saturday evening along Route 422 in Annville Township, the Office of the Lebanon County District Attorney reported.

A total of 478 vehicles were stopped. In addition to the DUI, citations were also issued for underage drinking, minors prohibited from possessing alcohol and driving with a suspended license. Thirteen warnings were issued.

The overtime pay for officers used in the checkpoint came from a grant from PennDOT.

Where else in the world can you be right 0.2% of the time and get a pat on the back?  In the bizzaro world of DUI enforcement, of course. DUI checkpoints are an inefficient affront on our civil liberties which have no real benefit from a public safety standpoint.  Had those same officers been assigned to roving patrols they would have probably made more arrests without disturbing close to 500 people who committed no crime at all.

PA DUI attorney Justin J. McShane is the President/CEO of The McShane Firm, LLC - Pennsylvania's top criminal law and DUI law firm. He is the highest rated DUI attorney in PA as rated by Avvo.com. Justin McShane is a double Board certified attorney. He is the first and so far the only Pennsylvania attorney to achieve American Bar Association recognized board certification in DUI defense from the National College for DUI Defense, Inc. He is also a Board Certified Criminal Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy, a Pennsylvania Supreme Court Approved Agency.

Comments

comments

2 responses to “Pennsylvania DUI Checkpoints: A Model of Inefficiency”

  1. […] DUI checkpoints are horribly inefficient and less than 1% of drivers stopped are actually arrested.  When questioned about this, the police tout the deterrent affect  of these checkpoints (there is about as much evidence for this as there is for the Boogie Man).  They say that drunk drivers find out about checkpoints and stay off the road.  If that really is the case, then why are they bothered by people warning each other over social media?  Shouldn’t they be happy that more drunk driver are finding out about it and staying of the roads? […]

  2. […] under the guise of DUI enforcement.  DUI checkpoints are not about arrests, because they are woefully inefficient at that.  They are about […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *