Money is Important, but Justice is Priceless.

The following was an editorial that was printed on the front page of The Paxton Herald.

Money is Important, but Justice is Priceless.


By Justin J. McShane, JD, F-AIC



I dream of a time when there are no drunk drivers on the road. Drunk driving costs lives and ruins families. It is a horrible crime. I detest it. I see the death, carnage and damage on a daily basis. DUI is not only the most frequently violated crime in this state, but is also the most costly in terms of every single metric: lives, property damage, police resources, court resources, taxpayer money, and impact to families. We also, however, must protect the integrity of prosecutions. The right people must be punished for the right crimes.

Money is important. Taxes are high. Times are tough. We need to be prudent and stingy not only with our own household money, but especially so with our public money.

Science helps us prosecute the right people for the right crimes. One of the ways to be tough on crime is to be tough on the science that is used to prove the crime. Safe roads come from awareness of DUI and its harm as well as proper enforcement of DUI. Proper enforcement of DUI means solid science. The best deterrence to DUI is to make the science behind DUI beyond question and rock solid. Right now, many people know or suspect that the science can be beaten in a DUI case. As a result, people play a dangerous Russian Roulette game with all of us that are on the roads by getting behind the wheel when they should not and just take the chance that, if caught, they can beat the DUI.

In this state, there are certain levels of DUI based upon alcohol content: 0.08, greater than 0.10, and 0.16 or higher. The higher your alcohol content, the worse the punishment will be.

Until recently, the major way the government proves DUI in Dauphin County is through breath testing.

There is a problem all across the state when it comes to DUI Breath Testing. The problem is now well known and now well proven. The way that the government chooses to use breath testing is not scientific.

The issue at the heart of this case came on August 27, 2010, when a motorist my firm represented filed a motion that claimed that the government could not provide any evidence anyone’s BrAC result was above 0.16%.

This challenge was tasked to the Honorable Lawrence F. Clark, Jr. of Dauphin County. Judge Clark, as a former Pennsylvania State Police Trooper and instructor at the PSP academy, was the most logical choice by the President Judge to hold this hearing that would have statewide impact.

The trial court handled the issue with care, caution, and thought. It made the decision to hold hearings on the issue and took steps to invite government agencies including the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General, the Pennsylvania Department of Health, PennDOT, and the Pennsylvania State Police. All of these agencies, but PennDOT, declined to become involved. PennDOT only attended the first organizational meeting, but declined to participate further. The trial court scheduled meetings and entered various orders governing the litigation as well as required detailed and comprehensive expert reports.

Many other motorists joined Mr. Schildt in his challenge.

The litigation began in April 2012. For the combined defendants, the court heard extensive testimony from Dr. Lee Polite, PhD (an expert in analytical chemistry and spectroscopy), Dr. Jerry Messman, PhD (a retired National Institutes Standards and Technology[1] spectroscopist, and active international metrologist[2]), and Dr. Jimmy Valentine, PhD (an expert in toxicology, pharamcology, and analytical chemistry, as well as a retired state Breath Testing program administrator). The government called Mr. Brian Faulkner. He was an electrical engineer employed by CMI, Inc— one of the machine manufacturers that Schildt challenged. He was not qualified as an expert in spectroscopy, metrology, or analytical chemistry.

After conducting thorough meetings, hearing four concentrated days of scientific testimony, and reviewing the parties’ legal writings, the trial court entered an order granting our motion on December 31, 2012. The trial court concluded that the government can’t provide for any evidence of breath-alcohol content (BrAC), using breath-test devices, above 0.15%. It was this lack of evidence that caused the trial court to grant our motion. The trial court did so not because of any regulatory or statutory infirmity.

The trial court recognized that the government has two mandatory points (0.05 BrAC, and 0.10 BrAC) and a third mandatory optional point (some value greater than 0.10 by multiples of 0.05) for field calibration. As the trial court explained, the government could have chosen 0.20 to solve this issue, but instead, it chose the narrower range that did not cover this essential element—0.16 BrAC. Because of how the Commonwealth chose to implement the machines’ calibration checks, the government can never prove that essential element of the crime (above a 0.16 BrAC).

On appeal, the government argued two issues: (1) that our challenge invalidated the statute; and (2) we improperly used pre-trial procedures to challenge the admissibility of his breath-alcohol breath test. The Superior Court panel, after we conceded as it had from the beginning that the statutes and regulations surrounding breath-alcohol breath testing are valid, found the trial court prematurely held the Commonwealth to its burden of proof at trial when it dismissed the charge that required proof of a BrAC above 0.16.

Simply put, the 0.05, 01.10, and 0.15 BrAC concentrations can be thought of like the end zone of a football game. The sidelines set the boundary for what is inbounds (touchdown) and what is out of bounds (no touchdown). The government can be thought of as the NFL. The NFL makes a choice to make its rules to set how wide or narrow the end zone is going to be. The NFL cannot come back later and claim that a clearly out-of-bounds catch is now in-bounds because it wants a certain team to win. The same is true with the government and its choice to not include the sideline out past 0.16 BrAC. This creates a fatal forensic flaw in the evidence much like a cliff. One is never slightly off a cliff. Likewise, one is simply never slightly out of calibration. The choice of the 0.15 over the 0.20 makes it so there is a proverbial cliff past that 0.15 BrAC reading where there is no evidence.

The BrAC involved in all prosecutions of 75 Pa.C.S.A. §3802(c), where the government has to prove a BrAC greater than 0.16, is an essential element of the crime. This means without the BrAC there can be no trial and no conviction can stand.

In a unanimous three-judge memorandum decision, a Superior Court panel reversed the Judge Clark’s well written 32-page decision granting our motion.

If the Superior Court’s opinion is allowed to stand, this exact issue will be litigated hundreds, if not thousands of times, all across Pennsylvania to great expense of the Public Defender’s Offices, District Attorney’s offices, and private citizens as well as strain judicial resources. It will cost thousands and perhaps millions of dollars.

For the sake of safe roads, for the sake of saving taxpayer money, and for the sake of justice, we should all hope that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court takes this issue head on, and give us certainty in the safety of our roads, and certainty that only those who are truly guilty are punished.

[1][1] The National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) is a government agency. It is the official national metrology body for the United States that makes and certifies standards used nationally and internationally and sets up measurement standards that are used in government and private industry.

[2][2] Metrology is the established scientific study of measurement.

xosotin chelseathông tin chuyển nhượngcâu lạc bộ bóng đá arsenalbóng đá atalantabundesligacầu thủ haalandUEFAevertonxosofutebol ao vivofutemaxmulticanaisonbethttps://bsport.fithttps://onbet88.ooohttps://i9bet.bizhttps://hi88.ooohttps://okvip.athttps://f8bet.athttps://fb88.cashhttps://vn88.cashhttps://shbet.atbóng đá world cupbóng đá inter milantin juventusbenzemala ligaclb leicester cityMUman citymessi lionelsalahnapolineymarpsgronaldoserie atottenhamvalenciaAS ROMALeverkusenac milanmbappenapolinewcastleaston villaliverpoolfa cupreal madridpremier leagueAjaxbao bong da247EPLbarcelonabournemouthaff cupasean footballbên lề sân cỏbáo bóng đá mớibóng đá cúp thế giớitin bóng đá ViệtUEFAbáo bóng đá việt namHuyền thoại bóng đágiải ngoại hạng anhSeagametap chi bong da the gioitin bong da lutrận đấu hôm nayviệt nam bóng đátin nong bong daBóng đá nữthể thao 7m24h bóng đábóng đá hôm naythe thao ngoai hang anhtin nhanh bóng đáphòng thay đồ bóng đábóng đá phủikèo nhà cái onbetbóng đá lu 2thông tin phòng thay đồthe thao vuaapp đánh lô đềdudoanxosoxổ số giải đặc biệthôm nay xổ sốkèo đẹp hôm nayketquaxosokq xskqxsmnsoi cầu ba miềnsoi cau thong kesxkt hôm naythế giới xổ sốxổ số 24hxo.soxoso3mienxo so ba mienxoso dac bietxosodientoanxổ số dự đoánvé số chiều xổxoso ket quaxosokienthietxoso kq hôm nayxoso ktxổ số megaxổ số mới nhất hôm nayxoso truc tiepxoso ViệtSX3MIENxs dự đoánxs mien bac hom nayxs miên namxsmientrungxsmn thu 7con số may mắn hôm nayKQXS 3 miền Bắc Trung Nam Nhanhdự đoán xổ số 3 miềndò vé sốdu doan xo so hom nayket qua xo xoket qua xo so.vntrúng thưởng xo sokq xoso trực tiếpket qua xskqxs 247số miền nams0x0 mienbacxosobamien hôm naysố đẹp hôm naysố đẹp trực tuyếnnuôi số đẹpxo so hom quaxoso ketquaxstruc tiep hom nayxổ số kiến thiết trực tiếpxổ số kq hôm nayso xo kq trực tuyenkết quả xổ số miền bắc trực tiếpxo so miền namxổ số miền nam trực tiếptrực tiếp xổ số hôm nayket wa xsKQ XOSOxoso onlinexo so truc tiep hom nayxsttso mien bac trong ngàyKQXS3Msố so mien bacdu doan xo so onlinedu doan cau loxổ số kenokqxs vnKQXOSOKQXS hôm naytrực tiếp kết quả xổ số ba miềncap lo dep nhat hom naysoi cầu chuẩn hôm nayso ket qua xo soXem kết quả xổ số nhanh nhấtSX3MIENXSMB chủ nhậtKQXSMNkết quả mở giải trực tuyếnGiờ vàng chốt số OnlineĐánh Đề Con Gìdò số miền namdò vé số hôm nayso mo so debach thủ lô đẹp nhất hôm naycầu đề hôm naykết quả xổ số kiến thiết toàn quốccau dep 88xsmb rong bach kimket qua xs 2023dự đoán xổ số hàng ngàyBạch thủ đề miền BắcSoi Cầu MB thần tàisoi cau vip 247soi cầu tốtsoi cầu miễn phísoi cau mb vipxsmb hom nayxs vietlottxsmn hôm naycầu lô đẹpthống kê lô kép xổ số miền Bắcquay thử xsmnxổ số thần tàiQuay thử XSMTxổ số chiều nayxo so mien nam hom nayweb đánh lô đề trực tuyến uy tínKQXS hôm nayxsmb ngày hôm nayXSMT chủ nhậtxổ số Power 6/55KQXS A trúng roycao thủ chốt sốbảng xổ số đặc biệtsoi cầu 247 vipsoi cầu wap 666Soi cầu miễn phí 888 VIPSoi Cau Chuan MBđộc thủ desố miền bắcthần tài cho sốKết quả xổ số thần tàiXem trực tiếp xổ sốXIN SỐ THẦN TÀI THỔ ĐỊACầu lô số đẹplô đẹp vip 24hsoi cầu miễn phí 888xổ số kiến thiết chiều nayXSMN thứ 7 hàng tuầnKết quả Xổ số Hồ Chí Minhnhà cái xổ số Việt NamXổ Số Đại PhátXổ số mới nhất Hôm Nayso xo mb hom nayxxmb88quay thu mbXo so Minh ChinhXS Minh Ngọc trực tiếp hôm nayXSMN 88XSTDxs than taixổ số UY TIN NHẤTxs vietlott 88SOI CẦU SIÊU CHUẨNSoiCauVietlô đẹp hôm nay vipket qua so xo hom naykqxsmb 30 ngàydự đoán xổ số 3 miềnSoi cầu 3 càng chuẩn xácbạch thủ lônuoi lo chuanbắt lô chuẩn theo ngàykq xo-solô 3 càngnuôi lô đề siêu vipcầu Lô Xiên XSMBđề về bao nhiêuSoi cầu x3xổ số kiến thiết ngày hôm nayquay thử xsmttruc tiep kết quả sxmntrực tiếp miền bắckết quả xổ số chấm vnbảng xs đặc biệt năm 2023soi cau xsmbxổ số hà nội hôm naysxmtxsmt hôm nayxs truc tiep mbketqua xo so onlinekqxs onlinexo số hôm nayXS3MTin xs hôm nayxsmn thu2XSMN hom nayxổ số miền bắc trực tiếp hôm naySO XOxsmbsxmn hôm nay188betlink188 xo sosoi cầu vip 88lô tô việtsoi lô việtXS247xs ba miềnchốt lô đẹp nhất hôm naychốt số xsmbCHƠI LÔ TÔsoi cau mn hom naychốt lô chuẩndu doan sxmtdự đoán xổ số onlinerồng bạch kim chốt 3 càng miễn phí hôm naythống kê lô gan miền bắcdàn đề lôCầu Kèo Đặc Biệtchốt cầu may mắnkết quả xổ số miền bắc hômSoi cầu vàng 777thẻ bài onlinedu doan mn 888soi cầu miền nam vipsoi cầu mt vipdàn de hôm nay7 cao thủ chốt sốsoi cau mien phi 7777 cao thủ chốt số nức tiếng3 càng miền bắcrồng bạch kim 777dàn de bất bạion newsddxsmn188betw88w88789bettf88sin88suvipsunwintf88five8812betsv88vn88Top 10 nhà cái uy tínsky88iwinlucky88nhacaisin88oxbetm88vn88w88789betiwinf8betrio66rio66lucky88oxbetvn88188bet789betMay-88five88one88sin88bk88xbetoxbetMU88188BETSV88RIO66ONBET88188betM88M88SV88Jun-68Jun-88one88iwinv9betw388OXBETw388w388onbetonbetonbetonbet88onbet88onbet88onbet88onbetonbetonbetonbetqh88mu88Nhà cái uy tínpog79vp777vp777vipbetvipbetuk88uk88typhu88typhu88tk88tk88sm66sm66me88me888live8live8livesm66me88win798livesm66me88win79pog79pog79vp777vp777uk88uk88tk88tk88luck8luck8kingbet86kingbet86k188k188hr99hr99123b8xbetvnvipbetsv66zbettaisunwin-vntyphu88vn138vwinvwinvi68ee881xbetrio66zbetvn138i9betvipfi88clubcf68onbet88ee88typhu88onbetonbetkhuyenmai12bet-moblie12betmoblietaimienphi247vi68clupcf68clupvipbeti9betqh88onb123onbefsoi cầunổ hũbắn cáđá gàđá gàgame bàicasinosoi cầuxóc đĩagame bàigiải mã giấc mơbầu cuaslot gamecasinonổ hủdàn đềBắn cácasinodàn đềnổ hũtài xỉuslot gamecasinobắn cáđá gàgame bàithể thaogame bàisoi cầukqsssoi cầucờ tướngbắn cágame bàixóc đĩaAG百家乐AG百家乐AG真人AG真人爱游戏华体会华体会im体育kok体育开云体育开云体育开云体育乐鱼体育乐鱼体育欧宝体育ob体育亚博体育亚博体育亚博体育亚博体育亚博体育亚博体育开云体育开云体育棋牌棋牌沙巴体育买球平台新葡京娱乐开云体育mu88qh88
Justin McShane

PA DUI attorney Justin J. McShane is the President/CEO of The McShane Firm, LLC - Pennsylvania's top criminal law and DUI law firm. He is the highest rated DUI attorney in PA as rated by Justin McShane is a double Board certified attorney. He is the first and so far the only Pennsylvania attorney to achieve American Bar Association recognized board certification in DUI defense from the National College for DUI Defense, Inc. He is also a Board Certified Criminal Trial Advocate by the National Board of Trial Advocacy, a Pennsylvania Supreme Court Approved Agency.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *